Characteristic Inequalities in Banach Spaces and Applications : Current School News

Characteristic Inequalities in Banach Spaces and Applications

ADS! Download JAMB CBT Software Now for FREE!

Characteristic Inequalities in Banach Spaces and Applications.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Dedication iii
Preface v
Acknowledgement vii
1 Preliminaries 1
1.1 Basic notions of functional analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Differentiability in Banach spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.2 Duality mapping in Banach spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.1.3 The signum function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.1.4 Convex functions and sub-differentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2 Characteristic Inequalities 11
2.1 Uniformly convex spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1.1 Strictly convex spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1.2 Inequalities in uniformly convex spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.2 Uniformly smooth spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.1 Inequalities in uniformly smooth spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.2 Characterization of uniformly smooth spaces by the duality maps . . 21
3 Sunny Nonexpansive Retraction 23
3.1 Construction of sunny nonexpansive retraction in Banach spaces . . . . . . . 23
4 An Application of Sunny Nonexpansive Retraction 33
Bibliography 37

INTRODUCTION

Basic notions of functional analysis: In this chapter, we recall some definitions and results from linear functional analysis. Proposition 1.1.1 (The Parallelogram Law) Let X be an inner product space.

Then for arbitrary x, y ∈ X, kx + yk 2 + kx − yk 2 = 2 kxk 2 + kyk 2  . Theorem 1.1.1 (The Riesz Representation Theorem) Let H be a Hilbert space and let f be a bounded linear functional on H.

Then there exists a unique vector y0 ∈ H such that f(x) = hx, y0i for each x ∈ H and ky0k = kfk.

Theorem 1.1.2 Let X be a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space, K be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of X. Then for any fixed x ∈ X there exists a unique m∗ ∈ K such that kx − m∗ k = inf k∈K kx − kk. Proof.

Let x ∈ X be fixed, and define Px : X → R ∪ {∞} by Px(k) =  kx − kk, if k ∈ K, ∞, if k /∈ K. Clearly Px is convex. Indeed, let λ ∈ (0, 1) and k1, k2 ∈ X. If any of k1 or k2 is not in K, then Px(λk1 + (1 − λ)k2) ≤ λPx(k1) + (1 − λ)Px(k2) since the right handside is ∞.

Now suppose both elements are in K. Then Px(λk1 + (1 − λ)k2) = kλ(k1 − x) + (1 − λ)(k2 − xk ≤ kλ(k1 − x)k + k(1 − λ)(k2 − xk = λPx(k1) + (1 − λ)Px(k2). We next show that Px is lower semicontinuous.

By the continuity of the map k 7→ kx − kk, k ∈ K, we have Px is lower semicontinuous on K. We now show Px is lower semicontinuous on Kc .

Let x0 ∈ Kc and α ∈ R such that α < Px(x0). Since K is closed, Kc is an open neighbourhood of x0 and α < Px(y) ∀y ∈ Kc . Hence Px is lower semicontinuous on Kc and therefore on the whole X. Obviously Px is proper.

Next, we show that Px is coercive. Let y ∈ X. Then Px(y) ≥ kyk − kxk ≥ kyk − kyk 2 = kyk 2 provided kyk ≥ 2kxk. This implies that Px(y) → ∞ as kyk → ∞.

Thus, Px is lower semicontinuous, convex, proper, and coersive. Hence there exists m∗ ∈ X such that Px(m∗ ) ≤ Px(m) ∀m ∈ X. Since Px(y) = ∞ for all y ∈ Kc and K 6= ∅, we must have m∗ ∈ K. Furthermore kx−m∗k = Px(m∗ ) ≤ Px(k) = kx − kk, ∀k ∈ K.

This completes the proof. We now show that m∗ ∈ K is unique. Indeed, if x ∈ K then m∗ = x and hence it is unique.

Suppose x ∈ Kc and m 6= n such that kx − mk = kx − nk ≤ kx − kk ∀k ∈ K, then 1 kx − mk k 1 2 ((x − m) + (x − n))k < 1. This implies that kx − 1 2 (m + n)k < kx − mk and this contradict the fact that m is a minimizing vector in K.

Therefore m∗ ∈ K is unique. Corollary 1.1.1 Let X be a uniformly convex Banach space and K be any nonempty, closed and convex subset of X. Then for arbitrary x ∈ X there exists a unique k ∗ ∈ K such that kx − k ∗ k = inf k∈K kx − kk.

Remark If H is a real Hilbert space and M is any nonempty, closed, and convex subset of H then in view of the above corollary, then there exists a unique map PM : H → M defined by x 7→ PMx, where kx − PMxk = inf m∈M kx − mk. This map is called the projection map.

The following properties of projection map PM of H onto M are well known. (1) z = PMx ⇔ hx − z, m − zi ≤ 0 ∀m ∈ M. (2) kPMx − PMyk 2 ≤ hx − y, PMx − PMyi ∀x, y ∈ H, which implies that kPMx − PMyk ≤ kx − yk ∀x, y ∈ H, i.e., PM is nonexpansive. (3) PM(PMx + t(x − PMx)) = PMx ∀t ≥ 0.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arkady Aleyner and Simeon Reich; An Explicit Construction of Sunny Nonexpansive Retractions in Banach Spaces, Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2005:3(2005)295- 305

C.E. Chidume; Applicable functional analysis, International Centre for Theoretical Physics Trieste, Italy, July 2006.

C. E. Chidume ; Geometric Properties of Banach Spaces and Nonlinear Iterations, International Center for Theoretical Physics, Triesty, Italy, June 2008

C.E. Chidume., Zegeye, H. and Shahzad, N.; Convergence theorems for a common fixed point of finite family of nonself nonexpansive mappings, Fixed Point Theory Application. (2005), no. 2, 233-241.

Haim Brezis; Functional Analysis,Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations,Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2010.

Joseph Diestel; Geometry of Banach Spaces, Springer-Verlag(1975).djvu

N. Shioji and W. Takahashi; Strong Convergence of Approximated Sequences for Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125(1997), no. 12, 3641-3645.

R. E. Bruck; Nonexpansive Projections on Subset of Banach Spaces, Pacific J. Math. 47(1973), 341-355.

Tomas Dominguez Benavides, Genaro Lopez Acedo and Hong-Kun Xu; Construction of Sunny Nonexpansive Retraction in Banach Spaces, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society / Volume 66 / Issue 01 / August 2002, pp 9-16.

Join Over 5 Million Subscribers Today!


=> FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM | FACEBOOK & TWITTER FOR LATEST UPDATE

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: